Shiny Doom Forum Forum Index Shiny Doom Forum
Forum content does NOT necessarily reflect the views of the Admins of this forum. Read at your own risk.
Doom doom doom doom doom doom doom doom DOOM doom doom doom
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Mircrosoft suing ppl

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Shiny Doom Forum Forum Index -> What's Going On?
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Should the kid be allowed to keep the site?
Yes
75%
 75%  [ 3 ]
No
25%
 25%  [ 1 ]
Total Votes : 4

Author Message
Trool
Good Karma
Good Karma


Joined: 12 Sep 2003
Posts: 1486

PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 12:18 pm    Post subject: Mircrosoft suing ppl Reply with quote

don't know if any of u heard of this, but some kid named mike rowe registered domain name mikerowesoft.com. He thought it'd be cool to have something that similar to microsoft. Microsoft is now suing him. Just wondering what ppl's thoughs r on this? I don't think i can misspell mirosoft to get the kids address, so i don't really see the harm in this, but someone might be trying to use the slippery slope argument or something.

u can read more at: http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/internet/01/19/offbeat.mike.rowe.soft.ap/index.html
_________________
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, isn't 'Eureka!' but rather 'hmm....that's funny.'

--Isaac Asimov
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Mogri
Uber-Karma
Uber-Karma


Joined: 12 Sep 2003
Posts: 535
Location: Malvern & Philadelphia, PA

PostPosted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 12:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I mean, come on... you don't intentionally name something that sounds like someone else's franchise, especially when you're in the same or similar business. Microsoft, as does anyone, has the legal right to protect their name in interest of business name-recognition, which is why we have laws for this that are exercised on a very regular basis. I think this person's actions are just stupid, except it will give the MS haters something more to hate them about, and it will give Mike Rowe a lot of press (mostly positive).
_________________
"A club without the right direction, is a misguided stick."
-- Master Wham
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
fate
Uber-Karma
Uber-Karma


Joined: 11 Sep 2003
Posts: 1178

PostPosted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 12:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

1. he's a 17 year old and 2. the name of his webpage has his own name in it. What the hell is microsoft trying to accomplish? Do they seriously think he poses a threat to their income? come on! They won't get any money from him simply because he most likely has none. Yes what he did was stupid and a joke and microsoft should realise this instead going after him full force. Microsoft should have better things to do. Rolling Eyes
_________________
People's whole lives do pass before their eyes before they die. The process is called living.

Most of the time its easier to get along with people before you get to know them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Jastermereel
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 1:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Its not as if anyone is going to go to his site and think they are dealing with Satan...err...Microsoft.........regardless of whether you think his actions are stupid or foolish...microsoft has no legal rights to that domain......this has even less merit than Fox sewing Al Frankin for using the phrase "fair and balanced" in the title of his book: Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the right
Back to top
Trool
Good Karma
Good Karma


Joined: 12 Sep 2003
Posts: 1486

PostPosted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 2:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well Microsoft might be dropping the case now or at least going for a settlement. http://news.com.com/2100-1014_3-5143614.html

one interesting thing from the article is:
Quote:
Under the law, Microsoft is required to take action to protect its trademark against widespread infringement. Struan Robertson, editor of Out-Law.com, a Web site that covers legal issues affecting information technology, explained that if a holder does not take action to protect its trademark whenever it is aware of a potential infringement, it risks losing that protection.


does this mean that it only takes one time of not suing someone for intruding on ur name to have that protection go away??? That might explain a lot of the realy silly law suits that big corporations do to protect their names...
_________________
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, isn't 'Eureka!' but rather 'hmm....that's funny.'

--Isaac Asimov
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
fate
Uber-Karma
Uber-Karma


Joined: 11 Sep 2003
Posts: 1178

PostPosted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 3:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

if that is correct then that is a pretty silly loophole...hmm
_________________
People's whole lives do pass before their eyes before they die. The process is called living.

Most of the time its easier to get along with people before you get to know them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mogri
Uber-Karma
Uber-Karma


Joined: 12 Sep 2003
Posts: 535
Location: Malvern & Philadelphia, PA

PostPosted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 7:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

1. if you are old enough to register a domain name, then you should be fully aware of the law; age makes no difference
2. mikerowe.com is fine; adding 'soft' to the makes it infringement; something like rowesoft is also acceptable; just imagine your initials were AMD... that doesn't mean you can establish yourself as a company under your initials

I believe it is not so much a 'loop-hole', however if you do not enforce it once, but you practive selective enforcement, then lawyers of subsequent cases say that if one infriger is allowed, why selectively punish one? In which case they need punish all or none.

I don't believe a full out lawsuit would be the best first option, however if they requested this person revoke the domain name, and were refused, then legal action should be taken.

As far as the law and concept of the law go, size and revenue of a company do not matter.
_________________
"A club without the right direction, is a misguided stick."
-- Master Wham
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Jastermereel
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 9:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Its not even close to the hypothetical "AMD" situation......if he called his little website Microsoft...then that would be a valid argument......as it is though...he'd have to call his company Ayemdee (phoneticaly the same)...in which circumstance as well, it would be virtualy impossible to imagine anyone confusing the two...

Basicaly though...he isn't making money due to any real or imagined confusion between the two...and microsoft isn't loosing any money, except that which they spend on lawyers for this foolish endeavor...
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Shiny Doom Forum Forum Index -> What's Going On? All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group