View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Trool Good Karma
Joined: 12 Sep 2003 Posts: 1486
|
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2004 7:19 am Post subject: realistic bots |
|
|
http://edition.cnn.com/2004/TECH/02/02/social.robots.ap/
we r now one step closer to making bots look like people, but the question is do we want to...? I personaly don't think we do as long as we want bot to be tools only...what u guys think? _________________ The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, isn't 'Eureka!' but rather 'hmm....that's funny.'
--Isaac Asimov |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jastermereel Guest
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
rklee Uber-Karma
Joined: 11 Sep 2003 Posts: 495 Location: Malvern, PA Pittsburgh, PA
|
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2004 11:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with Max. I see no reason for it to resemble humans. Plus I have a fear of things that look human but isn't anyways . For all practical purposes for a robot... being able to smile is useless... in my opinion. I think it's cool and could create advances in perhaps motor designs or stuff like that however I don't think it in itself is very useful. _________________ "My Heart Is In the Work" - Andrew Carnegie |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Corgren Good Luck
Joined: 12 Sep 2003 Posts: 149
|
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2004 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Human-type features make exactly as much sense on a robot as they do in computer software (I mean things like "Clippy" here). While techie types won't like them (already quite happy to interact on the machine's level), the general public will respond far better with a "personality" that they can relate to, no matter how false the personality may seem. _________________ "Instead, it has always been there. I found it during the CT scan last year, when the mummy was lifted. It lay loose in the sand around the king's body. It was mummified," Zahi Hawass, chief of Egypt's Supreme Council of Antiquities, told Discovery News. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fate Uber-Karma
Joined: 11 Sep 2003 Posts: 1178
|
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2004 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
if clippy was a robot clippy would be severely mangled now....people can relate to them sure but what if they forget for a moment that its a machine and not a person, they may end up braking it...or their hands/feet in furious rage and frustriation _________________ People's whole lives do pass before their eyes before they die. The process is called living.
Most of the time its easier to get along with people before you get to know them. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Trool Good Karma
Joined: 12 Sep 2003 Posts: 1486
|
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
also humanoid bots that behave human is one thing...i guess u can use ur clippy example, he is ment to look cartoony and therefore ppl r fine with him, he isn't even approching the uncanny valley, but on the other hand there hasn't been any software...or at least not much that tried to make u believe it was human, even games like creatures and sims have things that can only be realy caracatures of human. To me there is no problem making machine inteligent and responding to ppl on their level with their language, I just don't see a useful point in also making them look human, I think if you try to do that there would be a huge lash back from the public, maybe in a long time from now when bots have become house hold products it might make sense, but i don't think that will be any time soon. _________________ The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, isn't 'Eureka!' but rather 'hmm....that's funny.'
--Isaac Asimov |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|